<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Say Hello to my Little Friend &#187; Philosophy of mind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/category/philosophy-of-mind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, theology, politics and social issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:21:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright © Say Hello to my Little Friend 2011 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>glenn@orcon.net.nz (Dr Glenn Peoples)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>glenn@orcon.net.nz (Dr Glenn Peoples)</webMaster>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, theology, politics and social issues.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, philosophy, theology, politics and social issues</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>philosophy, theology, religion, Christianity, philosophy, of, religion</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture">
		<itunes:category text="Philosophy" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Christianity" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>glenn@orcon.net.nz</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.beretta-online.com/pics/itunespic.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Physicalism and the Incarnation</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2012/physicalism-and-the-incarnation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2012/physicalism-and-the-incarnation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=3081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I believe that non-material things exist (God being the most obvious such thing), when it comes to human beings I’m a physicalist, a monist, call it what you will. We, unlike God, are physical beings. And yet, like all Christians (i.e. this is one of the doctrinal litmus tests for being a Christian), I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2012/physicalism-and-the-incarnation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 043: In Search of the Soul Revisited &#8211; Aristotle and Aquinas</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/episode-043-in-search-of-the-soul-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/episode-043-in-search-of-the-soul-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aquinas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aristotle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This episode is a very late addition to the series &#8220;In Search of the Soul,&#8221; looking at the various options that exist in philosophy of mind. In the original five part series I was very conscious of the fact that I was leaving out the view of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas, and this addendum is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/episode-043-in-search-of-the-soul-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_043.mp3" length="58046974" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>1:00:26</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>This episode is a very late addition to the series &#8220;In Search of the Soul,&#8221; looking at the various options that exist in philosophy of mind. In the original five part series I was very conscious of the fact that I was leaving out the vie[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>This episode is a very late addition to the series &#8220;In Search of the Soul,&#8221; looking at the various options that exist in philosophy of mind. In the original five part series I was very conscious of the fact that I was leaving out the view of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas, and this addendum is my penance for that fact. As promised in the episode, here are just a few suggestions for further reading, from authors who defend &#8220;hylemorphic dualism.&#8221;
David Oderberg, Real Essentialism
David Oderberg, &#8220;Hylemorphic Dualism&#8221; in Ellen Paul, Fred Miller and Jeffrey Paul (eds), Personal Identity
Edward Feser, Philosophy of Mind: A Beginner&#8217;s Guide

If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Philosophy, podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moreland on Neuroscience and Souls</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/moreland-on-neuroscience-and-souls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/moreland-on-neuroscience-and-souls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morelandphysicalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to philosopher J P Moreland, the findings of neuroscience show – tentatively at least – that substance dualism is true and all forms of physicalism are false. Specifically, he says that the science of the brain shows that consciousness is not and cannot be the function of physical beings. It shows, on the contrary, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/moreland-on-neuroscience-and-souls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Haldane and Glenn Peoples on physicalism</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/john-haldane-and-glenn-peoples-on-physicalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/john-haldane-and-glenn-peoples-on-physicalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public lectures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may know, while I was in the UK recently I visited Justin at Premiere Radio who hosts the Unbelievable? Radio show. We recorded two episodes, and the first one aired on the 4th of September (my birthday &#8211; how appropriate!) and is now available in the show&#8217;s podcast. You can subscribe to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/john-haldane-and-glenn-peoples-on-physicalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What decent physicalism is not</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/what-decent-physicalism-is-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/what-decent-physicalism-is-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My current lunch time reading project is the 2007 book by Nancey Murphy and Warren Brown, Did My Neurons Make Me Do It? Philosophical and Neurobiological Perspectives on Moral Responsibility and Free Will (Oxford University Press). Although I’ve only just broached the first chapter, I can already tell that I’m really going to enjoy it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/what-decent-physicalism-is-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plantinga on Dualism</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/plantinga-on-dualism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/plantinga-on-dualism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 05:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind/body problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m in the process of writing the next podcast episode on Alvin Plantinga and his arguments around the idea of belief in God as a properly basic belief. In it, I’m clearly on Plantinga’s side, and I think his work in that area represents a crucial contribution to philosophy of religion (and to epistemology). I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/plantinga-on-dualism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philosophy of Mind and the &#8220;Hyperpreterist&#8221; controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/philosophy-of-mind-and-the-hyperpreterist-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/philosophy-of-mind-and-the-hyperpreterist-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intermediate state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preterism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resurrection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also published this blog entry over at the Preterist Blog. I’m under no illusions about the fact that my view on the mind-body problem is a minority view in the history of Christian thought. I’m a physicalist. This puts me in the minority because, as well known Christian philosopher of mind William Hasker (himself [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/philosophy-of-mind-and-the-hyperpreterist-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 Corinthians 12 – an “out of body” experience?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/2-corinthians-12-an-out-of-body-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/2-corinthians-12-an-out-of-body-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apostle Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intermediate state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind-body problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Testament Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I&#8217;m familiar with the view that the Apostle Paul is relating an &#8220;out of body experience&#8221; at the outset of 2 Corinthians 12, I&#8217;m pretty sure that he is not. That&#8217;s partly because I&#8217;m a physicalist and I don&#8217;t think that such things are even possible, but it&#8217;s also because the evidence for this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/2-corinthians-12-an-out-of-body-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuts and Bolts 006: What is Dualism?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/nuts-and-bolts-006-what-is-dualism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/nuts-and-bolts-006-what-is-dualism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 08:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[nuts and bolts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s the next instalment of the “Nuts and Bolts” series, in which I spell out some of the basic terms and concepts used in the various branches of philosophy and theology. I’ve already written plenty of blog entries (and even a podcast series) on dualism, but a recent online conversation with a couple of Christian [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/nuts-and-bolts-006-what-is-dualism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eat, Drink, and be Merry: 1 Corinthians 15 and Physicalism</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/1-corinthians-15-and-physicalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/1-corinthians-15-and-physicalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heaven and Hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apostle Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intermediate state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Testament Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resurrection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every Christian who decides on a stance to take on the mind-body issue is going to have to live with the fact that there will be certain “problem texts” in the Bible that appear to conflict with the position they take. As a physicalist, I think there is a very small number of such texts [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/1-corinthians-15-and-physicalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes Dr Pruss it&#8217;s funny, just not in the right way.</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/yes-dr-pruss-its-funny-just-not-in-the-right-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/yes-dr-pruss-its-funny-just-not-in-the-right-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alexander Pruss recently presented this &#8220;fun argument for dualism&#8221; at his blog: (Premise) Our embodiment is universally seen as funny. (Premise, justified inductively by 1) Our embodiment is objectively funny. (Premise) The essence of the funny is incongruity. (Premise) If materialism is true, there is no incongruity in our embodiment. (Premise) If materialism is false, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/yes-dr-pruss-its-funny-just-not-in-the-right-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 033: In Search of the Soul, Part 5</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-033-in-search-of-the-soul-part-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-033-in-search-of-the-soul-part-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At last, the series ends. Here is part five of the series on the mind/body problem. This episode steps completely away from analytical philosophy and is an overview of some of the biblical material that bears on the subject. Although it&#8217;s a comparatively long episode (just under fifty minutes), it&#8217;s still a very sketchy overview. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-033-in-search-of-the-soul-part-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_033.mp3" length="47992925" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:49:58</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>At last, the series ends. Here is part five of the series on the mind/body problem. This episode steps completely away from analytical philosophy and is an overview of some of the biblical material that bears on the subject. Although it&#8217;s a co[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>At last, the series ends. Here is part five of the series on the mind/body problem. This episode steps completely away from analytical philosophy and is an overview of some of the biblical material that bears on the subject. Although it&#8217;s a comparatively long episode (just under fifty minutes), it&#8217;s still a very sketchy overview. The subject is a large one, and at best I can get the ball rolling and encourage you to look further. Enjoy.  
&#160;
&#160;

If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>podcast, religion</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 032: In Search of the Soul, Part 4</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-032-in-search-of-the-soul-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-032-in-search-of-the-soul-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resurrection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the fourth installment on my series on the mind-body problem. In this episode I look at the argument against physicalism from the afterlife. Here, some dualists argue that if physicalism were true, then the resurrection of the dead would be logically impossible. Their argument is: The doctrine of the resurrection of the dead entails that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-032-in-search-of-the-soul-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_032.mp3" length="46145257" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:48:03</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Here&#8217;s the fourth installment on my series on the mind-body problem.
In this episode I look at the argument against physicalism from the afterlife. Here, some dualists argue that if physicalism were true, then the resurrection of the dead woul[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Here&#8217;s the fourth installment on my series on the mind-body problem.
In this episode I look at the argument against physicalism from the afterlife. Here, some dualists argue that if physicalism were true, then the resurrection of the dead would be logically impossible. Their argument is:

The doctrine of the resurrection of the dead entails that people will be raised back to life who are the same people who died long ago. In other words, they will have the same identity.
 Sameness of identity requires unbroken metaphysical continuity (that is, the continued, uninterrupted or “non-gappy” existence of whatever thing the functioning person is, whether a physical thing or an immaterial mind).
 In physicalism, it is logically impossible for there to be unbroken metaphysical continuity between a physical person who died a hundred years ago and a person who will be raised to life in the future.
 Therefore if physicalism is true, the doctrine of the resurrection of the dead is logically impossible. Stated differently, a physicalist cannot consistently believe in the resurrection of the dead.

How might a physicalist respond to this line of argument? Listen to find out. As promised in the episode, here are a few pieces of work by Trenton Merricks that relate to some of the material I cover:
&#8220;How to Live Forever Without Saving your Soul,&#8221; in Kevin Corcoran (ed.) Soul, Body, and Survival: Essays on the Metaphysics of Human Persons (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001), 183-200
&#8220;There Are No Criteria of Identity Over Time,&#8221; Noûs 32:1 (1998), 106-124.
&#8220;The Resurrection of the Body and the Life Everlasting&#8221; in Michael J. Murray (ed.), Reason for the Hope Within (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999), 261-286.
Enjoy.  

Glenn Peoples
If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>metaphysics, Philosophy, podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 031: In Search of the Soul, Part 3</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-031-in-search-of-the-soul-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-031-in-search-of-the-soul-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 05:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The podcast is back. Here&#8217;s part three of the series on philosophy of mind. We&#8217;ve moved from dualism in part one through to physicalism in this episode. I look at epiphenomenialism, reductionism, nonreductive physicalism and a constitution view. As promised, here&#8217;s some suggested reading for those who want to look into the subject futher: Nancey [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-031-in-search-of-the-soul-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_031.mp3" length="39072654" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:54:14</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>The podcast is back. Here&#8217;s part three of the series on philosophy of mind. We&#8217;ve moved from dualism in part one through to physicalism in this episode. I look at epiphenomenialism, reductionism, nonreductive physicalism and a constituti[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>The podcast is back. Here&#8217;s part three of the series on philosophy of mind. We&#8217;ve moved from dualism in part one through to physicalism in this episode. I look at epiphenomenialism, reductionism, nonreductive physicalism and a constitution view.
As promised, here&#8217;s some suggested reading for those who want to look into the subject futher:
Nancey Murphy, &#8220;Nonreductive Physicalism and Free Will&#8221; http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10501/Default.aspx
Nancey Murphy, “Is “Nonreductive Physicalism” an Oxymoron?” http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10865/Default.aspx
Nancey Murphy and Warren Brown, Did My Neurons Make Me Do It?: Philosophical and Neurobiological Reflections on Moral Responsibility and Free Will (Oxford University Press, 2009).
Joel B. Green and Stuart L. Palmer (eds), In Search of the Soul: Four Views of the Mind-Body Problem (Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2005). This volume includes contributions from Stewart Goetz (Substance Dualism), William Hasker (Emergent Dualism), Nancey Murphy (Nonreductive Physicalism) and Kevin Corcoran (Constitution View).
Joel B. Green (ed.), What About the Soul?: Neuroscience and Christian Anthropology (Abingdon Press, 2001). This volume includes contributions from Bill T. Arnold, D. Gareth  Jones, Joel B. Green, Patrick D. Miller, Charles E. Gutenson, Stuart L. Palmer, William Hasker, Michael Rynkiewich, Virginia T. Holeman, Lawson G. Stone and Malcolm Jeeves.
Warren S. Brown, Nancey Murphy and H. Newton Maloney (eds), Whatever Happened to the Soul: Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature (Augsburg Fortress, 1998). This volume includes contributions from Nancey Murphy, H. Newton Malony, Ray S. Anderson, V. Elving Anderson, Francisco J. Ayala, Warren S. Brown Jr., Joel B. Green, Malcolm Jeeves, H. Newton Malony and Stephen G. Post.
Kevin Corcoran, Rethinking Human Nature: A Christian Materialist Alternative to the Soul (Baker Academic, 2006).
The website of Timothy O&#8217;Connor, featuring a number of articles.
Happy reading, and I hope you find this episode interesting!  
Glenn Peoples

If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Philosophy, podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dualism: Plantinga&#039;s soft spot</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/dualism-plantingas-soft-spot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/dualism-plantingas-soft-spot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alvin Plantinga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[materialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind-body problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I&#8217;m in the middle of a podcast series on the nature of the mind or soul and its relation to the body or brain (or both), my interests in general have been hovering around the issue, so here&#8217;s a blog post to add to the mix. Alvin Plantinga is one of my favourite philosophers, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/dualism-plantingas-soft-spot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 027: In Search of the Soul, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-027-in-search-of-the-soul-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-027-in-search-of-the-soul-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergentism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here it is (at last!), part two of the series on philosophy of mind, In Search of the Soul. In this episode I introduce the viewpoint called emergentism, and I explore the argument for dualism from free will. It&#8217;s not the most exciting of episodes, but it&#8217;s worth including and listening to if you&#8217;re wanting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-027-in-search-of-the-soul-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_027.mp3" length="42816461" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:44:34</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Here it is (at last!), part two of the series on philosophy of mind, In Search of the Soul. In this episode I introduce the viewpoint called emergentism, and I explore the argument for dualism from free will.
It&#8217;s not the most exciting of epis[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Here it is (at last!), part two of the series on philosophy of mind, In Search of the Soul. In this episode I introduce the viewpoint called emergentism, and I explore the argument for dualism from free will.
It&#8217;s not the most exciting of episodes, but it&#8217;s worth including and listening to if you&#8217;re wanting to get a decent overview of philosophy of mind because it lays out a major position (emergentism) and examines a pretty common argument for dualism. In episode 28 (I&#8217;ve decided that the whole series will be no more than five episodes long), I&#8217;ll look at William Hasker&#8217;s (among other people) objection to physicalism from the possibility of an afterlife, which I think will be a lot more interesting.
Glenn Peoples

If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>metaphysics, Philosophy, podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 026: In Search of the Soul, part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-026-in-search-of-the-soul-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-026-in-search-of-the-soul-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode of the Say Hello to my Little Friend podcast I start a four part series on philosophy of mind. I know I recently said that it would be a three part series, but hey, even four parts isn&#8217;t really enough to give the subject the full treatment it deserves. In part one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-026-in-search-of-the-soul-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_026.mp3" length="39563092" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:41:11</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this episode of the Say Hello to my Little Friend podcast I start a four part series on philosophy of mind. I know I recently said that it would be a three part series, but hey, even four parts isn&#8217;t really enough to give the subject the fu[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this episode of the Say Hello to my Little Friend podcast I start a four part series on philosophy of mind. I know I recently said that it would be a three part series, but hey, even four parts isn&#8217;t really enough to give the subject the full treatment it deserves. In part one I start with the dualist end of the spectrum. Today it&#8217;s Cartesian/Platonic dualism, which I take to be the most popular variety.
After recording the episode I thought maybe I should have thrown this in, so I&#8217;ll add it here. It&#8217;s a rather witty wee argument offered by Kevin Corcoran in the book that this series gets its name from, In Search of the Soul: Four Views of the Mind-Body Problem. The argument appears in his reply to Cartesian dualist Stewart Goetz:
Stewart Goetz sometimes kisses his wife.
Stewart Goetz&#8217;s substantively simple soul never kisses anyone. (It has no lips!)
Therefore, Stewart Goetz is not a simple soul.
If you&#8217;re not yet familiar with what the term &#8220;simple&#8221; means in this context, listen to the episode, then come back and read Corcoran&#8217;s argument. Also in this episode I have my first ever &#8220;caller,&#8221; Joe Johnson from the &#8220;Watching Theology&#8221; podcast. You too can call into the show by emailing me an audio clip of your comments and questions. Send them to peoples dot glenn at gmail dot com.
Enjoy!
Glenn Peoples

If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Philosophy, podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#039;s in the next podcast series:</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/whats-in-the-next-podcast-series/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/whats-in-the-next-podcast-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey all. I&#8217;m putting together the next podcast series, which at this stage will consist of three episodes. The theme will be philosophy of mind, and it&#8217;s going to go something like this: Episode one will be the introduction and overview of the subject as a subject in philosophy. I&#8217;ll look at the major categories [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/whats-in-the-next-podcast-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another notch in my belt</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/another-notch-in-my-belt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/another-notch-in-my-belt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[career]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For people many years into their academic careers this might seem like nothing to speak of, but with a relatively short list of publications and being only recently graduated, this is big news for me. Another paper of mine, this time my piece on William Hasker&#8217;s emergent dualism and life after death (see the article [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/another-notch-in-my-belt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hasker at the Bridge of Death</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2007/hasker-at-the-bridge-of-death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2007/hasker-at-the-bridge-of-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergentism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind/body problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Hasker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve put up a draft version of my latest article: &#8220;Hasker at the Bridge of Death.&#8221; Professor Hasker has been kind enough to look over the paper for me, but in the meantime I welcome feedback and criticism from one and all. Here&#8217;s a basic rundown of the paper: William Hasker thinks that physicalism has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2007/hasker-at-the-bridge-of-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

