<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Say Hello to my Little Friend &#187; metaphysics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/category/metaphysics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, theology, politics and social issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 01:42:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright © Say Hello to my Little Friend 2011 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>glenn@orcon.net.nz (Dr Glenn Peoples)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>glenn@orcon.net.nz (Dr Glenn Peoples)</webMaster>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, theology, politics and social issues.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, philosophy, theology, politics and social issues</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>philosophy, theology, religion, Christianity, philosophy, of, religion</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture">
		<itunes:category text="Philosophy" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Christianity" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>glenn@orcon.net.nz</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.beretta-online.com/pics/itunespic.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Does John 1:3 rule out uncreated abstract objects?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/does-john-13-rule-out-uncreated-abstract-objects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/does-john-13-rule-out-uncreated-abstract-objects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 04:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abstract objects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platonism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend today brought my attention to his question, put to William Lane Craig, on whether or not the existence of uncreated abstract objects is compatible with biblical teaching. The question concerns a disagreement that Bill Craig has with Peter Van Inwagen of Notre Dame University. It might be helpful, therefore, if I outline the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/does-john-13-rule-out-uncreated-abstract-objects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuts and Bolts 008: Nominalism</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/nuts-and-bolts-008-nominalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/nuts-and-bolts-008-nominalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuts and bolts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the “nuts and bolts” series, I explain and discuss some of the fundamental ideas in philosophy (and theology sometimes) that are taken for granted within the discipline, but which might not be very well known to ordinary human beings. This time the subject is nominalism. Do tables exist? Do all red apples (assuming that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/nuts-and-bolts-008-nominalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 032: In Search of the Soul, Part 4</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-032-in-search-of-the-soul-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-032-in-search-of-the-soul-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resurrection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the fourth installment on my series on the mind-body problem. In this episode I look at the argument against physicalism from the afterlife. Here, some dualists argue that if physicalism were true, then the resurrection of the dead would be logically impossible. Their argument is: The doctrine of the resurrection of the dead entails that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-032-in-search-of-the-soul-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_032.mp3" length="46145257" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:48:03</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Here&#8217;s the fourth installment on my series on the mind-body problem.
In this episode I look at the argument against physicalism from the afterlife. Here, some dualists argue that if physicalism were true, then the resurrection of the dead woul[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Here&#8217;s the fourth installment on my series on the mind-body problem.
In this episode I look at the argument against physicalism from the afterlife. Here, some dualists argue that if physicalism were true, then the resurrection of the dead would be logically impossible. Their argument is:

The doctrine of the resurrection of the dead entails that people will be raised back to life who are the same people who died long ago. In other words, they will have the same identity.
 Sameness of identity requires unbroken metaphysical continuity (that is, the continued, uninterrupted or “non-gappy” existence of whatever thing the functioning person is, whether a physical thing or an immaterial mind).
 In physicalism, it is logically impossible for there to be unbroken metaphysical continuity between a physical person who died a hundred years ago and a person who will be raised to life in the future.
 Therefore if physicalism is true, the doctrine of the resurrection of the dead is logically impossible. Stated differently, a physicalist cannot consistently believe in the resurrection of the dead.

How might a physicalist respond to this line of argument? Listen to find out. As promised in the episode, here are a few pieces of work by Trenton Merricks that relate to some of the material I cover:
&#8220;How to Live Forever Without Saving your Soul,&#8221; in Kevin Corcoran (ed.) Soul, Body, and Survival: Essays on the Metaphysics of Human Persons (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001), 183-200
&#8220;There Are No Criteria of Identity Over Time,&#8221; Noûs 32:1 (1998), 106-124.
&#8220;The Resurrection of the Body and the Life Everlasting&#8221; in Michael J. Murray (ed.), Reason for the Hope Within (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999), 261-286.
Enjoy.  

Glenn Peoples
If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>metaphysics, Philosophy, podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuts and Bolts 002: (numerical) Identity</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/nuts-and-bolts-002-numerical-identity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/nuts-and-bolts-002-numerical-identity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuts and bolts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the second installment in the “nuts and bolts” series of blog posts, where I take some of the “nuts and bolts,” the basic concepts employed within philosophy (and later I suppose I’ll use examples in theology as well) and explain them for those who might not be as familiar with them as people [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/nuts-and-bolts-002-numerical-identity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Numerical identity does not require Qualitative identity</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/numerical-identity-does-not-require-qualitative-identity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/numerical-identity-does-not-require-qualitative-identity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m doing some writing on the concept of numerical identity at present, so I thought it might be interesting to consult Google to see what others have said about it. I can usually rely on the contributors to the Standford Encyclopedia of philosophy, but this time somebody (Harold Noonan), I daresay, got it wrong. He [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/numerical-identity-does-not-require-qualitative-identity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dualism: Plantinga&#039;s soft spot</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/dualism-plantingas-soft-spot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/dualism-plantingas-soft-spot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alvin Plantinga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[materialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind-body problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I&#8217;m in the middle of a podcast series on the nature of the mind or soul and its relation to the body or brain (or both), my interests in general have been hovering around the issue, so here&#8217;s a blog post to add to the mix. Alvin Plantinga is one of my favourite philosophers, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/dualism-plantingas-soft-spot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 027: In Search of the Soul, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-027-in-search-of-the-soul-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-027-in-search-of-the-soul-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergentism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here it is (at last!), part two of the series on philosophy of mind, In Search of the Soul. In this episode I introduce the viewpoint called emergentism, and I explore the argument for dualism from free will. It&#8217;s not the most exciting of episodes, but it&#8217;s worth including and listening to if you&#8217;re wanting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/episode-027-in-search-of-the-soul-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_027.mp3" length="42816461" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:44:34</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Here it is (at last!), part two of the series on philosophy of mind, In Search of the Soul. In this episode I introduce the viewpoint called emergentism, and I explore the argument for dualism from free will.
It&#8217;s not the most exciting of epis[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Here it is (at last!), part two of the series on philosophy of mind, In Search of the Soul. In this episode I introduce the viewpoint called emergentism, and I explore the argument for dualism from free will.
It&#8217;s not the most exciting of episodes, but it&#8217;s worth including and listening to if you&#8217;re wanting to get a decent overview of philosophy of mind because it lays out a major position (emergentism) and examines a pretty common argument for dualism. In episode 28 (I&#8217;ve decided that the whole series will be no more than five episodes long), I&#8217;ll look at William Hasker&#8217;s (among other people) objection to physicalism from the possibility of an afterlife, which I think will be a lot more interesting.
Glenn Peoples

If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>metaphysics, Philosophy, podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Middle Knowledge &#8211; Is there still freedom?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/250/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/250/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[determinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreknowledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Previously I have written generally favorable comments on the middle knowledge perspective on divine foreknowledge &#8211; a perspective also called Molinism. Right at the outset of this post I want to say that I still maintain that favorable stance towards that perspective. I also want to stress that this particular area of philosophy is by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/250/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

