<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Say Hello to my Little Friend &#187; justice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/category/justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, theology, politics and social issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 01:42:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright © Say Hello to my Little Friend 2011 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>glenn@orcon.net.nz (Dr Glenn Peoples)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>glenn@orcon.net.nz (Dr Glenn Peoples)</webMaster>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, theology, politics and social issues.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, philosophy, theology, politics and social issues</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>philosophy, theology, religion, Christianity, philosophy, of, religion</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture">
		<itunes:category text="Philosophy" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Christianity" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>glenn@orcon.net.nz</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.beretta-online.com/pics/itunespic.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>A Godless Public Square?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/a-godless-public-square/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/a-godless-public-square/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaking engagements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Godless Public Square: Do &#8220;private&#8221; religious beliefs have a place in public life? On Wednesday the 3rd of August 2011 I&#8217;ll be taking part in a panel discussion on religion in the public square, tackling the issue from the standpoint of theology, philosophy and law. Joining me will be my good friends Matthew Flannagan [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/a-godless-public-square/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bus Driver taken to court for defending young girl</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/bus-driver-taken-to-court-for-defending-young-girl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/bus-driver-taken-to-court-for-defending-young-girl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hat tip to M and M for bringing this news story to my attention. Remember that controversy over the anti-smacking law? The short story: The law change in New Zealand meant that absolutely any force of any kind used in the discipline of a child (such as a spank, or moving a child by force [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/bus-driver-taken-to-court-for-defending-young-girl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreshore and Seabed Act to go (hopefully)</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/foreshore-seabed-act-to-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/foreshore-seabed-act-to-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Foreshore and Seabed Act 1994 was a moral travesty. The Treaty of Waitangi – an agreement entered into by Crown and Iwi (Maori tribal groups) &#8211; made the following guarantee: Her Majesty the Queen of England confirms and guarantees to the Chiefs and Tribes of New Zealand and to the respective families and individuals [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/foreshore-seabed-act-to-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the provocation defence: politicans are not lawyers, and it shows</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/on-the-provocation-defence-politicans-are-not-lawyers-and-it-shows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/on-the-provocation-defence-politicans-are-not-lawyers-and-it-shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A parliamentary committee has recommended that the partial defence of provocation should be abolished. I explained in an earlier blog why that&#8217;s a bad idea. However, the responses that the members of parliament have given to the very sensible concerns over the abolition of this partial defence confirm my worst fears about the whole process: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/on-the-provocation-defence-politicans-are-not-lawyers-and-it-shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolterstorff and Peoples on Rawls &#8211; It has a nice ring to it, no?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/wolterstorff-and-peoples-on-rawls-it-has-a-nice-ring-to-it-no/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/wolterstorff-and-peoples-on-rawls-it-has-a-nice-ring-to-it-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Rawls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolterstorff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not the kind of guy who tends to be fazed when people – even people for whom I hold a good deal of respect as insightful thinkers – do not agree with me. However, I&#8217;m also someone who likes to see people that I respect as insightful thinkers expressing the same conclusion as me. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/wolterstorff-and-peoples-on-rawls-it-has-a-nice-ring-to-it-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Key, the Anti-Smacking law, and the New Zealand Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/john-key-the-anti-smacking-law-and-the-new-zealand-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/john-key-the-anti-smacking-law-and-the-new-zealand-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As readers will be aware, the vast majority of those who voted in New Zealand&#8217;s recent referendum  on section 59 of the Crimes Act voted for change. They voted for the decriminalisation of light smacking as part of correction. Currently, subsection 2 of this law explicitly states that nothing in the Act permits the use [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/john-key-the-anti-smacking-law-and-the-new-zealand-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The anti-smacking law: Only a law change is morally acceptable</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-anti-smacking-law-only-a-law-change-is-morally-acceptable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-anti-smacking-law-only-a-law-change-is-morally-acceptable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NZ Prime Minister John Key is saying that he takes the referendum outcome seriously, and that he wants to reassure parents that they will not be investigated or prosecuted just for smacking a child. See the story here. Police and Child Youth and Family officials will be warned to not prosecute parents for lightly smacking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-anti-smacking-law-only-a-law-change-is-morally-acceptable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sue Bradford calls supporters of her law stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/sue-bradford-calls-supporters-of-her-law-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/sue-bradford-calls-supporters-of-her-law-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sue Bradford, the MP who first proposed the anti-smacking law in New Zealand, is not surprised that the majority of those who voted in the recent referendum do not share her views. However, she maintains, some of those who voted &#8220;No&#8221; were actually people who do support her, but accidentally ticked the wrong box. She [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/sue-bradford-calls-supporters-of-her-law-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The opponents of the anti-smacking law outnumber the supporters of ANY New Zealand government</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-opponents-of-the-anti-smacking-law-outnumber-the-supporters-of-any-new-zealand-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-opponents-of-the-anti-smacking-law-outnumber-the-supporters-of-any-new-zealand-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spotted this over at Kiwiblog today: 1,420,959 – Voted no to treating correctional smacking as a criminal offence 1,053,398 – 2008 Voted for National when they won the election 935,319 – 2005 Voted for Labour when they won the election 838,219 – 2002 Voted for Labour 800,199 – 1999 Voted for Labour 701,315 – [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-opponents-of-the-anti-smacking-law-outnumber-the-supporters-of-any-new-zealand-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Zealand does not want a smack to be a crime</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/new-zealand-does-not-want-a-smack-to-be-a-crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/new-zealand-does-not-want-a-smack-to-be-a-crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the result of the referendum is in. Nobody ever doubted that it would be a landslide, but as a formality, let&#8217;s note that 87.6% of those who wanted their voice heard in this referendum voted no. Parents who smack their children as part of correction should not ipso facto be deemed criminals, as they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/new-zealand-does-not-want-a-smack-to-be-a-crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The smacking referendum &#8211; my summary</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-smacking-referendum-my-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-smacking-referendum-my-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As plenty of readers will already know, New Zealanders are currently taking part in a postal referendum on the issue of whether or not a parent smacking a child under any circumstances should be a crime. I have already voted no. In 2007 Sue Bradford of the Green Party was successful in having section 59 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-smacking-referendum-my-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(dis)honest to God: How Not to Argue about the Smacking Referendum</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/dishonesty-about-smacking-referendum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/dishonesty-about-smacking-referendum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ian Harris tells us (“Honest to God,” Dominion Post, [Dominion Post. Saturday July 11, 2009. Page B5], reproduced at the YesVote website) that we should reject the “harsh views” on child rearing found in the Bible. Mr Harris, unfortunately, joins many of those who promote the criminalisation of good parents by muddying the waters. He [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/dishonesty-about-smacking-referendum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Provocation Defence Needs to Remain</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-provocation-defence-needs-to-remain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-provocation-defence-needs-to-remain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guilty verdict of convicted murderer Clayton Weatherson today came as good news. However, some people, including the father of the victim Sophie Elliot, are now saying that the defence should not have been allowed to use the defence of provocation. In fact, they are saying that there should exist no such defence in law. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-provocation-defence-needs-to-remain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weatherston guilty of murder. He&#039;s not sick. He&#039;s evil.</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/weatherston-guilty-of-murder-hes-not-sick-hes-evil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/weatherston-guilty-of-murder-hes-not-sick-hes-evil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 02:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, as I expected, Clayton Weatherston was found guilty of murdering his then girlfriend, Sophie Elliot. He took a knife to her place, locked the door after him, stabbed her 216 times (in full view of her horrified mother), then mutilated parts of her body. The defence argued that he was provoked into doing all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/weatherston-guilty-of-murder-hes-not-sick-hes-evil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shallow threats against David Bain&#039;s accusers</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/shallow-threats-against-david-bain-accusers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/shallow-threats-against-david-bain-accusers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David bain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I figured this sort of empty threat would be made, which is why I posted my earlier blog entry on David Bain, Reasonable Doubt and Defamation. As is no secret, not everyone agrees with jury verdicts. The David Bain trial is no exception, and some people still believe that David Bain murdered his Family. Some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/shallow-threats-against-david-bain-accusers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Bain, reasonable doubt and defamation</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/david-bain-reasonable-doubt-and-defamation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/david-bain-reasonable-doubt-and-defamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David bain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Bain was found not guilty of murder, but given the rather divisive nature of the high profile case, there are still people who believe that he committed the murders of his family in 1994. This raises in my mind an interesting question about what people are allowed to say about their beliefs in public. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/david-bain-reasonable-doubt-and-defamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Bain and the meaning of a &quot;Not Guilty&quot; verdict</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/david-bain-and-the-meaning-of-a-not-guilty-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/david-bain-and-the-meaning-of-a-not-guilty-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David bain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, at the conclusion of what was probably New Zealand&#8217;s most closely followed murder (re)trial ever, David Bain was found not guilty of killing his parents and three siblings in Dunedin in 1994. I don&#8217;t quite know what I think about whether or not David did it. &#8220;What?&#8221; you might say. &#8220;But the court found [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/david-bain-and-the-meaning-of-a-not-guilty-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

