<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Say Hello to my Little Friend &#187; Epistemology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/category/epistemology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, theology, politics and social issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:21:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright © Say Hello to my Little Friend 2011 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>glenn@orcon.net.nz (Dr Glenn Peoples)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>glenn@orcon.net.nz (Dr Glenn Peoples)</webMaster>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, theology, politics and social issues.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, philosophy, theology, politics and social issues</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>philosophy, theology, religion, Christianity, philosophy, of, religion</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture">
		<itunes:category text="Philosophy" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Christianity" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>glenn@orcon.net.nz</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.beretta-online.com/pics/itunespic.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Episode 044: What is Faith?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/episode-044-what-is-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/episode-044-what-is-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This episode asks the question: &#8220;What is Faith&#8221;? Is it, as some maintain, just believing things for no good reason? When Christian thinkers over the years have spoken of having faith, what have they been talking about? Listen and find out! At the end of this episode I ask listeners if they have any suggestions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/episode-044-what-is-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_044.mp3" length="56178615" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:58:30</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>This episode asks the question: &#8220;What is Faith&#8221;? Is it, as some maintain, just believing things for no good reason? When Christian thinkers over the years have spoken of having faith, what have they been talking about? Listen and find ou[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>This episode asks the question: &#8220;What is Faith&#8221;? Is it, as some maintain, just believing things for no good reason? When Christian thinkers over the years have spoken of having faith, what have they been talking about? Listen and find out!
At the end of this episode I ask listeners if they have any suggestions for scholars that I might interview in future episodes. Be sure to speak up if you have any ideas!

If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Epistemology, Philosophy, podcast, religion</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could atheism be a properly basic belief?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/could-atheism-be-a-properly-basic-belief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/could-atheism-be-a-properly-basic-belief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 11:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alvin Plantinga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basic beliefs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conversation I had the other day reminded me of what is now a rather old argument in relation to the question of belief in God (old in terms of twentieth century arguments anyway). Essentially, the issue was this: If my purported experience of knowing God / knowing that God exists via some sort of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/could-atheism-be-a-properly-basic-belief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuts and Bolts 011: Ethical Intuitionism</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/nuts-and-bolts-011-ethical-intuitionism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/nuts-and-bolts-011-ethical-intuitionism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuts and bolts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intuitionism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the “nuts and bolts” series, I explain and discuss some of the fundamental ideas in philosophy (and theology sometimes) that are taken for granted within the discipline, but which might not be very well known to ordinary human beings. This time the subject is ethical intuitionism (or moral intuitionism). Firstly, and this cannot be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/nuts-and-bolts-011-ethical-intuitionism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Unexpected Hanging Paradox</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/the-unexpected-hanging-paradox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/the-unexpected-hanging-paradox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 07:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paradox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick “The Slasher” McGurk was found guilty of no fewer than nine counts of first-degree murder. A jury took just ten minutes to reach a unanimous guilty verdict. The case was open and shut. The judge donned his black cap and passed sentence: “Nicholas James McGurk, the court sentences you to death by hanging. Your [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/the-unexpected-hanging-paradox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arif Ahmed, morality and empiricism</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/arif-ahmed-morality-and-empiricism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/arif-ahmed-morality-and-empiricism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empiricism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the moral argument]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest episode of the Unbelievable? radio show is out this weekend. This time it features a discussion between me and Arif Ahmed, an atheist from the University of Cambridge. We were discussing the moral argument for theism. The discussion was certainly interesting enough, although it was divided up so as to fit into the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/arif-ahmed-morality-and-empiricism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Pumpkin Objection</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/the-great-pumpkin-objection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/the-great-pumpkin-objection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 10:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alvin Plantinga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basic beliefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last podcast episode on Plantinga and properly basic beliefs, I briefly discussed the “Great Pumpkin Objection.” As it’s a subject worthy of a blog post of its own, and given that I know some people prefer things in writing, I thought I’d add a blog entry focused on that objection. Alvin Plantinga has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/the-great-pumpkin-objection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 036: Plantinga and Properly Basic Beliefs</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-036-plantinga-and-properly-basic-beliefs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-036-plantinga-and-properly-basic-beliefs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alvin Plantinga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basic beliefs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s episode 36, in honour of the recent retirement of Alvin Plantinga as the John O&#8217;Brien Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. It&#8217;s sort of a &#8220;nuts and bolts&#8221; podcast episode on Alvin Plantinga, introducing the listener to his account of belief in God as a properly basic belief &#8211; a belief [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/episode-036-plantinga-and-properly-basic-beliefs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_036.mp3" length="34041829" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:55:27</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Here&#8217;s episode 36, in honour of the recent retirement of Alvin Plantinga as the John O&#8217;Brien Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. It&#8217;s sort of a &#8220;nuts and bolts&#8221; podcast episode on Alvin Plantinga, [...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Here&#8217;s episode 36, in honour of the recent retirement of Alvin Plantinga as the John O&#8217;Brien Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. It&#8217;s sort of a &#8220;nuts and bolts&#8221; podcast episode on Alvin Plantinga, introducing the listener to his account of belief in God as a properly basic belief &#8211; a belief justifiably held, but not held on the basis of evidence or argument.
Enjoy.
&#160;
&#160;

If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Epistemology, podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Internal Witness of the Holy Spirit and Christian Confidence</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-internal-witness-of-the-holy-spirit-and-christian-confidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-internal-witness-of-the-holy-spirit-and-christian-confidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basic beliefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inner witness of the Spirit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christian apologists (and Christians in general) have noted from time to time that there is an important difference between being able to know that God is real and being able to show that God is real. You can do the former without doing the latter. Christians have sometimes spoken about our ability to know that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/the-internal-witness-of-the-holy-spirit-and-christian-confidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuts and Bolts 003: Analytic and Synthetic Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/nuts-and-bolts-003-analytic-and-synthetic-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/nuts-and-bolts-003-analytic-and-synthetic-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuts and bolts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytic truth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When he was presented with the accused man Jesus of Nazareth, the governer Pontius Pilate asked a question laden with philosophical importance: “What is truth?” It&#8217;s a question that I think was adequately answered centuries earlier by Plato: “The essence of truth is to say of what is that it is, and to say of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/nuts-and-bolts-003-analytic-and-synthetic-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuts and Bolts 001: What is knowledge?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/nuts-and-bolts-what-is-knowledge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/nuts-and-bolts-what-is-knowledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuts and bolts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent discussion with one of the commenters over at M and M&#8217;s blog (see the interchange between myself and someone using the nickname &#8220;Heraclides&#8221;) it occurred to me yet again that there are people &#8211; especially on the internet &#8211; who frequently wander into arguments about what are essentially subjects in philosophy, who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/nuts-and-bolts-what-is-knowledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fales fails to fault Plantinga on warrant</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/fales-fails-to-fault-plantinga-on-warrant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/fales-fails-to-fault-plantinga-on-warrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alvin Plantinga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I&#8217;ve been saying a bit about Plantinga in the podcast recently, it&#8217;s fitting to comment on something that I recently found online. Evan Fales, back in 1994, wrote a book review critical of Alvin Plantinga&#8217;s Warrant and Proper Function. The review was originally published in the journal Mind, and you can read it here. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/fales-fails-to-fault-plantinga-on-warrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 013: Plantinga and Presuppositional Apologetics part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/episode-013-plantinga-and-presuppositional-apologetics-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/episode-013-plantinga-and-presuppositional-apologetics-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alvin Plantinga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s Episode 13, which is part 2 of my coverage of Plantinga and presuppositional apologetics. In this episode I present Alvin Plantinga&#8217;s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. I then close by summing up the similarity between Plantinga and Van Til and co., and respond to one objection that is common to them both. Also, for the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/episode-013-plantinga-and-presuppositional-apologetics-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_013.mp3" length="23454207" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:48:49</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Here&#8217;s Episode 13, which is part 2 of my coverage of Plantinga and presuppositional apologetics.
In this episode I present Alvin Plantinga&#8217;s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. I then close by summing up the similarity between Plan[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Here&#8217;s Episode 13, which is part 2 of my coverage of Plantinga and presuppositional apologetics.
In this episode I present Alvin Plantinga&#8217;s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. I then close by summing up the similarity between Plantinga and Van Til and co., and respond to one objection that is common to them both.
Also, for the first time ever &#8211; we have mail! I reply to it at the end of this episode.

If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>apologetics, Epistemology, Philosophy, podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 012: Plantinga and Presuppositional Apologetics</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/episode-012-plantinga-and-presuppositional-apologetics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/episode-012-plantinga-and-presuppositional-apologetics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alvin Plantinga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s Episode 12 of the Berettacast: &#8220;Plantinga and Presuppositional Apologetics.&#8221; I&#8217;ve decided to give Plantinga two episodes, as it ended up filling up a big chunk of time. This is part 1, which looks at Plantinga&#8217;s argument for theism from Warrant. If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/episode-012-plantinga-and-presuppositional-apologetics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_012.mp3" length="23638109" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:49:12</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Here&#8217;s Episode 12 of the Berettacast: &#8220;Plantinga and Presuppositional Apologetics.&#8221; I&#8217;ve decided to give Plantinga two episodes, as it ended up filling up a big chunk of time. This is part 1, which looks at Plantinga&#8217;s [...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Here&#8217;s Episode 12 of the Berettacast: &#8220;Plantinga and Presuppositional Apologetics.&#8221; I&#8217;ve decided to give Plantinga two episodes, as it ended up filling up a big chunk of time. This is part 1, which looks at Plantinga&#8217;s argument for theism from Warrant.

If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>apologetics, Epistemology, podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

