<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Say Hello to my Little Friend &#187; angry atheism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/category/angry-atheism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, theology, politics and social issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 01:42:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright © Say Hello to my Little Friend 2011 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>glenn@orcon.net.nz (Dr Glenn Peoples)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>glenn@orcon.net.nz (Dr Glenn Peoples)</webMaster>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, theology, politics and social issues.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>The New Zealand blog and podcast of Dr Glenn Peoples that discusses philosophy, philosophy, theology, politics and social issues</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>philosophy, theology, religion, Christianity, philosophy, of, religion</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture">
		<itunes:category text="Philosophy" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Christianity" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>glenn@orcon.net.nz</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.beretta-online.com/pics/itunespic.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Lawrence Krauss on God and Morality</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2012/lawrence-krauss-on-god-and-morality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2012/lawrence-krauss-on-god-and-morality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divine command theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Krauss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the moral argument]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=3205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Ah, those silly creationists are at it again. Every real scientist knows that evolution is fact, and then these people with no real experience in science come along and bumble through the issues without understanding them at all. And as for those geographers! I have no real time for geography myself, but pah! Everyone knows [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2012/lawrence-krauss-on-god-and-morality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitch: Being dead does not make him any more noble</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/hitch-being-dead-does-not-make-him-any-more-noble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/hitch-being-dead-does-not-make-him-any-more-noble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s bad taste to say unpleasant things about people when they’re dead. Well, no it’s not actually. Kim Jon Il just died and just today they were mocking him on the radio. Wartime songs were sung about Hitler after his demise, and so on. But in polite society, it’s not done. Christopher Hitchens lost his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/hitch-being-dead-does-not-make-him-any-more-noble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are the British Atheists so intimidated?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/why-are-the-british-atheists-so-intimidated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/why-are-the-british-atheists-so-intimidated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Lane Craig]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hat tip to Peter Byron who made this. If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/why-are-the-british-atheists-so-intimidated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate Review: William Lane Craig and Sam Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/debate-review-william-lane-craig-and-sam-harris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/debate-review-william-lane-craig-and-sam-harris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Lane Craig]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the evening of the 7th of April 2011 (the 8th of April here in New Zealand), Christian philosopher William Lane Craig debated Atheist author and speaker Sam Harris on the question Is Good from God? Brian Auten has made the mp3 audio of this debate available over at Apologetics 315. What follows is my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/debate-review-william-lane-craig-and-sam-harris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inspired by actual events</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/inspired-by-actual-events/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/inspired-by-actual-events/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Glenn! Sitting here at my keyboard, in isolation from the rest of the world, I have come up with the ultimate argument against all religious belief – especially Christian belief. I have not consulted history to see if anyone has addressed this question before. I have not read any contemporary literature on the subject [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/inspired-by-actual-events/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dawkins gets science and religion wrong. In other news, man bites dog.</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/dawkins-gets-science-and-religion-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/dawkins-gets-science-and-religion-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 02:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, I know. Pointing out that Richard Dawkins bungles the relationship between science and religion is a bit like shooting fish in a barrel. Next to getting confused about what arguments for religious belief actually say, he has built the latter part of his career on the practice of being wrong about the relationship [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2011/dawkins-gets-science-and-religion-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Ricky Gervais is a Comedian and not a Philosopher</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/why-ricky-gervais-is-a-comedian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/why-ricky-gervais-is-a-comedian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ricky Gervais has given us all a cheery holiday message about why he’s an atheist. People who believe in God don’t need proof of his existence, and they certainly don’t want evidence to the contrary. They are happy with their belief. They even say things like “it’s true to me” and “it’s faith”. I still [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/why-ricky-gervais-is-a-comedian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Atheism, Science and Morality &#8211; University of Auckland</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/the-new-atheism-science-and-morality-university-of-auckland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/the-new-atheism-science-and-morality-university-of-auckland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public lectures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=2044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday the 6th of September I spoke at the University of Auckland on The New Atheists, Science and Morality. The talk is like a live presentation version of a podcast on Sam Harris and morality that I did a while back, with some updates and variations. Jachin over at the Explaining the Bible website [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/the-new-atheism-science-and-morality-university-of-auckland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate Review: Flannagan V Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/debate-review-flannagan-v-bradley/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/debate-review-flannagan-v-bradley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divine command theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Is God the Source of Morality?” Is it rational to ground right and wrong in commands issued by God? Matthew Flannagan (left, affirmative) vs Raymond Bradley (right, negative) University of Auckland, 2nd of August 2010 Few subjects in philosophy are more interesting to me than the meta-ethical question of what makes any moral claims true. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/debate-review-flannagan-v-bradley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Dawkins and the Beliefs of Children</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/richard-dawkins-and-the-beliefs-of-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/richard-dawkins-and-the-beliefs-of-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 11:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I read a few comments by Richard Dawkins on the phrase “a Christian child” or “a Muslim child” etc. he writes: A phrase like “Catholic child” or “Muslim child” should clang furious bells of protest in the mind, just as we flinch when we hear “One man, one vote.” Children are too young to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/richard-dawkins-and-the-beliefs-of-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kalam: Does anything at all come into existence?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/kalam-does-anything-at-all-come-into-existence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/kalam-does-anything-at-all-come-into-existence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 11:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classical apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmological argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The kalam cosmological argument is a version of the argument from first causes. It is part of a philosophical case for the existence of God, and goes like this: Whatever begins to exist has a cause of its existence (This is the major premise) The universe began to exist (This is the minor premise) Therefore [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/kalam-does-anything-at-all-come-into-existence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Making of an Atheist (Review)</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/the-making-of-an-atheist-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/the-making-of-an-atheist-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James S. Spiegel, The Making of an Atheist: How Immorality Leads to Unbelief (Chicago: Moody, 2010), 141 pages including notes. One of the most endearing features of James Spiegel’s new book, The Making of an Atheist, is that it is quite short. You might think I’m kidding, or that this is a slight on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/the-making-of-an-atheist-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixed it for you</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/fixed-it-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/fixed-it-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spotted Richard Dawkins&#8217; DVD for sale at richarddawkins.net yesterday. I can&#8217;t believe they let such a whopping typo make it all the way through the production process. I fixed it. If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/fixed-it-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divine Command Ethics: When will sceptics update their arguments?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/divine-command-ethics-when-will-sceptics-update-their-arguments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/divine-command-ethics-when-will-sceptics-update-their-arguments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divine command theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that some online unbelievers have trouble staying up to date with the fields in which they take themselves to be experts. Take Keith Augustine over at the Internet Infidels for example. He believes that he has the divine command theory of ethics (DCT) all sewn up. For some reason, divine command ethics is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/divine-command-ethics-when-will-sceptics-update-their-arguments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When will Dawkins go after the left?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/when-will-dawkins-go-after-the-left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/when-will-dawkins-go-after-the-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I noted recently, Richard Dawkins has been at his fairy tale telling best, claiming that when Pat Robertson blamed Haiti&#8217;s poverty and earthquake on a nonexistent pact with Satan, in spite of what Christians say and have said for centuries and in spite of what the Bible actually teaches, it is Robertson who is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/when-will-dawkins-go-after-the-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Dawkins on Pat Robertson on Haiti</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/richard-dawkins-on-pat-robertson-on-haiti/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/richard-dawkins-on-pat-robertson-on-haiti/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Loftus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=1352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many readers will know, shortly after the earthquake in Haiti that did so much damage and claimed so many lives, Pat Robertson (a somewhat notorious televangelist involved in what has been dubbed &#8220;Word of Faith&#8221; theology) said something (I suppose I should say that he said yet another thing) that Christians in general didn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2010/richard-dawkins-on-pat-robertson-on-haiti/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steven Pinker comes clean: It&#8217;s not about science, it&#8217;s about atheism</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/pinker-its-not-about-science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/pinker-its-not-about-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Francis Collins&#8217; reputation is as is the brilliant scientist who cracked the human genome. Because of his outstanding qualifications, not too long ago he was appointed as the National Institutes of Health (NIH). It&#8217;s also no secret &#8211; because Dr Collins makes it no secret &#8211; that he is a Christian. It is the latter [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/pinker-its-not-about-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No true Scotsmen – or Christians</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/no-true-scotsmen-%e2%80%93-or-christians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/no-true-scotsmen-%e2%80%93-or-christians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christianity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The “no true Scotsman” fallacy (as it is called) is illustrated like this: William: No Scotsman wears underwear under his kilt Angus: Not true! I’m a bonnie Scotsman, and I wear underwear under me kilt! William: Ach! Then yer nee a true Scotsman! Away with ye! One who uses this fallacy makes their position beyond [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/no-true-scotsmen-%e2%80%93-or-christians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biblical Marriage?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/biblical-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/biblical-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology / Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have my share of concerns about the way some Christians view marriage and whether or not those views are really biblical, but that&#8217;s not what this blog post is about. Vorjack over at “Unreasonable Faith” has challenged the familiar appeal that Christians sometimes make to “biblical marriage” in their rejection of same-sex unions. He [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/biblical-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does perfect knowledge require total love?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/does-perfect-knowledge-require-total-love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/does-perfect-knowledge-require-total-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across a pretty bizarre claim today, courtesy of one Mr John Loftus. That claim is that omniscience is incompatible with the idea of a God who would inflict wrath. What inspired this unusual claim? Why, Oprah Winfrey interviewing Mike Tyson &#8211; naturally, what else? Apparently Mr Loftus thought Mike was just a big [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/does-perfect-knowledge-require-total-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skeptics and the annoyance of the little things&#8230;. like facts.</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/skeptics-and-the-annoyance-of-the-little-things-like-facts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/skeptics-and-the-annoyance-of-the-little-things-like-facts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Loftus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last few years I&#8217;ve noticed a pattern. I&#8217;ve seen plenty of skeptics present arguments against Christianity or certain aspects of Christianity like its moral code, its metaphysical beliefs and so forth. What I&#8217;ve noticed is that when a spokesperson presents an argument (say, against the &#8220;horrible&#8221; God of the Old Testament) and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/skeptics-and-the-annoyance-of-the-little-things-like-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baggini: The New Atheism is cringe material</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/baggini-the-new-atheism-is-cringe-material/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/baggini-the-new-atheism-is-cringe-material/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julian Baggini is an atheist who&#8217;s quite happy for people to know about it. I wish he weren&#8217;t, but hey, whatcha gonna do? Recently Mr Baggini has commented on the embarrassing spectacle that is the &#8220;new atheism,&#8221; a movement marked by volume and vehemence rather than substance and insight, spearheaded by the likes of Richard [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/baggini-the-new-atheism-is-cringe-material/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Craig vs Hitchens</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/craig-vs-hitchens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/craig-vs-hitchens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 07:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reasonable Faith is the website centred around the apologetics work of William Lane Craig. I&#8217;ve subscribed to their regular email newsletter. You should too. If you had, you&#8217;d know that on the evening of Saturday the 4th of April (that&#8217;s Sunday afternoon, the 5th of April here in New Zealand), William Lane Craig will be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2009/craig-vs-hitchens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fundamentalism and science: strange bedfellows?</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/fundamentalism-and-science-strange-bedfellows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/fundamentalism-and-science-strange-bedfellows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I keep you waiting for the next podcast episode (within the next couple of days, I swear!), this is a letter I wrote to the paper a few months ago. It was pretty long, and predictably they didn&#8217;t publish it. It was a response to this piece by Bob Brockie (be sure to hold [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/fundamentalism-and-science-strange-bedfellows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;It&#039;s only the religious who make threats&#8230;.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/its-only-the-religious-who-make-threats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/its-only-the-religious-who-make-threats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick note on something that happened today: I&#8217;ve been following with some interest the arguments about California&#8217;s proposition 8 that defined marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman, ruling out same-sex marriage. One disturbing development that has emerged is the wave of personal harassment, vandalism and even death threats [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/its-only-the-religious-who-make-threats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 020: The Argument from Atrocity</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/episode-020-the-argument-from-atrocity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/episode-020-the-argument-from-atrocity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should we reject Christianity because of the harmful deeds done in its name? Some have said so. This episode explains what is wrong with that line of reasoning. Here are the notes. Glenn Peoples If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/episode-020-the-argument-from-atrocity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.beretta-online.com/podcast/audio/berettacast_020.mp3" length="21091451" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:43:54</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Should we reject Christianity because of the harmful deeds done in its name? Some have said so. This episode explains what is wrong with that line of reasoning.
Here are the notes.
Glenn Peoples

If you liked this post, feel free to help support thi[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Should we reject Christianity because of the harmful deeds done in its name? Some have said so. This episode explains what is wrong with that line of reasoning.
Here are the notes.
Glenn Peoples

If you liked this post, feel free to help support this project.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>apologetics, podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Dr Glenn Peoples</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The untruthful thoughts of a reluctant atheist</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/the-untruthful-thoughts-of-a-reluctant-atheist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/the-untruthful-thoughts-of-a-reluctant-atheist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recall that not all that long ago, I posted my review of a debate between Christopher Hitchens and Alister McGrath. One of the points I made is as follows: Hitchens says that religion dissolves our duty to uphold the truth. Now as I said at the time, as a Christian the duty to uphold the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2008/the-untruthful-thoughts-of-a-reluctant-atheist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dawkins cuts McGrath, includes Haggard</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2007/72/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2007/72/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From this page: Alister McGrath Swept off the Cutting Room Floor William Dembski Last year I described how Richard Dawkins interviewed Alister McGrath for the BBC production THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL and then decided to leave him on the cutting room. Go here: http://www.uncommondescent.com/scien&#8230;isive-critics/ That interview, I’ve learned, is now available at Google Video [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2007/72/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruse vs Dawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2007/ruse-vs-dawkins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2007/ruse-vs-dawkins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[angry atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a bit slow on the uptake with this. Since &#8211; astoundingly &#8211; I don&#8217;t have much time for Richard Dawkins, I tend not to follow Dawkins-related controversies. I think the truth about Dawkins is pretty simple. He&#8217;s a popular scientist who has let it all go to his head and hence thinks he&#8217;s qualified [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beretta-online.com/wordpress/2007/ruse-vs-dawkins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

