Quote of the day, from John Locke:
Death then entered, and showed his face, which before was shut out, and not known. So St. Paul, Rom. v. 19, “By one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin,” i.e. a state of death and mortality : and, 1 Cor. xv. 22, “In Adam all die;” i.e. by reason of his transgression, all men are mortal, and come to die.
This is so clear in these cited places, and so much the current of the New Testament, that nobody can deny, but that the doctrine of the gospel is, that death came on all men by Adam’s sin; only they differ about the signification of the word death: for some will have it to be a state of guilt, wherein not only he, but all his posterity was so involved, that every one descended of him deserved endless torment, in hell-fire. I shall say nothing more here, how far, in the apprehensions of men, this consists with the justice and goodness of God, having mentioned it above: but it seems a strange way of understanding a law, which requires the plainest and directest words, that by death should be meant eternal life in misery. Could any one be supposed, by a law, that says, “For felony thou shalt die;” not that he should lose his life; but be kept alive in perpetual, exquisite torments? And would any one think himself fairly dealt with, that was so used?
John Locke, The Reasonableness of Christianity as Delivered in the Scriptures in the Works of John Locke (1824 edition, volume 6, p. 4.),
I part ways with Locke when he says that Adam’s sin did not involve the whole human race. Perhaps disturbing to some readers, I think that “Adam” in the story of Eden actually represented the whole human race but I won’t delve into that now (although for what it is worth, I think that this understanding removes the rationale for some of the crasser theories of the “transmission” of sin from Adam to us).
Locke’s comments on the actual punishment for sin, however, seem to me to be not only true, but to be obviously so. If only such common sense prevailed among my evangelical brothers and sisters!
Glenn Peoples
Similar Posts:
- In Defence of William Lane Craig on Original Sin
- John Locke on Voluntary Dictatorship
- Bar Ma'jan – calling all Talmud experts!
- A Christian cannot be a libertarian
- My Review of a Review of a Review of Waldron on Locke
- Peterson vs Peoples
Tags: annihilationism, death, hell, John Locke
Adam being representative of all mankind?
I’m all for not buying crass theories about the transmission of sin…but you know now you kinda have to make a blogpost or podcast or something!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I read Glenn as saying that the character “Adam” in the story of the garden of Eden represents the whole human race.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Although I think fairly highly of a theology federal headship, that’s not really what I meant here. Matt has it right: I actually meant to express the view that Adam was a portrait of humanity, he “represented” humanity as a synechdoche.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
That’s what I thought…I guess I just worded it poorly.
So, when will something about this be available for us Beretta fans?
lol
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Likewise, would it be considered fair for one man, a mass murderer, to receive the same capital punishment as one guilty of jay-walking.
Still, I don’t hold to hell-fire myself so this is pretty redundant.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Jason, well that’s a completely different issue really. This issue that Locke is identifying is about exegesis. Essentially the question here is over the best way to read straight forward language in Scripture.
The issue you raise is over our own personal assessment of what counts as fair. However, within the context of the issue you raise, the situation you describe might sound unfair initially – until you realise that you yourself do in fact say that the jaywalker gets capital punishment as well. The only claim you’re making is that they obviously deserve a different kind of capital punishment. Once this is realised, much of the plausibility of the objection evaporates, since the kind of sceptic who would raise the objection over a jaywalker getting the death penalty would almost certainly think that the jaywalker should not get the death penalty at all.
Here it may be helpful to think of people’s sin being their own actions. Choosing to cut oneself off from God, the source of all life, has the same consequences regardless of the nastiness of the person who does it.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0