Easter is a time of year that seems to bring sceptics out of the woodwork. The proverbial Grinches (wrong holiday, I know) find this to be a natural time of year to rain on the parade of Christians celebrating the death and resurrection of Christ. I still recall listening to the debate between Willian Lane Craig and Brian Edwards on the resurrection a few Easters ago (gosh, has it been that long? The year 2001 or 2000, I forget). You can check that debate out for yourself – Link to the debate.
It’s only fair, then, that Christians take this opportunity to capitalise on the flimsiness of sceptical arguments out there (hence my last post on the supposed virgin birth of Buddha), and also to continue to illustrate the way that the biblical account of the life, death and resurrection of Jesus stands up well to critical scrutiny.
So here’s a brief thought to consider for today: Why were so many (although not all) of the Apostles martyred? What was the reason for killing them? That’s something of a no-brainer. They were killed for their proclamation of their religious beliefs in an effort to convert the local populaces where they lived. They proclaimed the message of the resurrection of Christ, and it cost them.
Here is where I think many sceptics fail to appreciate the way an interesting apologetical case can be made in favour of the resurrection of Jesus. What some of them hear is “the Apostles were so passionate about their beliefs they were willing to die rather that give them up. So the belief must be true.” The way I’ve personally seen sceptics react to this is to say something like “so what? Deluded fools die for false beliefs all the time, whether they’re a breakaway cult in Texas or a suicide bomber in Iraq. What does that prove? It certainly doesn’t show that the belief is true.”
This objection is correct – dying for a belief does not prove that the belief is true, but the objection seriously misunderstands the nature of the argument to begin with. The point is not just that since the Apostles died for a belief, it must be true. The point is that if Jesus did not rise from the dead and did not meet with his apostles after the resurrection, then the Apostles would be in a unique position to know that he did not. In other words, unlike skeptical enquirers today, the Apostles actually knew whether or not Jesus rose from the dead. It’s true that many people do die for beliefs that are, in fact, not true. It is not true, however, that a lot of people willingly die for a belief even though they are fully aware that the belief is a load of rubbish.
If a Mormon dies for her faith, she will do so fully convinced that Joseph Smith met an angel and found golden plates, but the reality is that she could not have been a witness to the fact and so is not in a unique position to know these things.
If a Muslim dies for his faith, he will do so fully convinced that the events surrounding the life of Muhammed centuries ago really took place, but again, he simply wasn’t there and must trust accounts handed down to him (and I am not saying this necessarily leads to false beliefs).
But when the Apostles died for their proclamation that Jesus was risen from the dead, they did so knowing full well whether these events had taken place in their lives or not. That this is the case, and that none of them shrunk back from death and retracted their story, but all were willing to suffer and die rather than say that Jesus had not risen from the dead, is itself a striking historical argument for the resurrection of Jesus.
(The alternative thesis that by an amazing coincidence they all began to suffer from exactly the same delusion about a man being raised from the dead is not a compelling explanation, but that’s another story.)
C. Michael Patton has spelt out this argument in further detail HERE.
Glenn Peoples
Similar Posts:
- Eat, Drink, and be Merry: 1 Corinthians 15 and Physicalism
- A theological pet peeve
- “God of the Living” – William Tyndale and the Resurrection
- Let this cup pass from me: A Good Friday reflection
- Easter: The Mission is the Message
- Episode 032: In Search of the Soul, Part 4
Tags: apologetics, Easter



















Interesting post Glenn.
I have written a reply post but blogger is down for 10 minutes so cant upload it. Will do soon!!
My question is around the role of the HS in this. Jesus death was important but it seems as if the apostles weren’t really changed until the HS came upon them.
http://banbers.blogspot.com/
cheers
banbers
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Hi Banbers. True, they weren’t changed until the Holy Spirit empowered them, and let’s remember: Empowered them to do what? Simply being empowered by the Holy Spirit wasn’t going to get them killed. It was their testimony to the risen Christ that did that, and Holy Spirit or no, their knowledge of whether or not Christ really had risen is what makes their willing deaths so telling.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Hey Glenn, the links to the debate don’t seem to be working…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Hmmm, they worked when I wrote this blog entry back in 2009. I’ll replace them with a working link now, thanks Brendan!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Cheers mate – that’s a goer!
Like or Dislike:
0
0